Add block-

Add block-

Studying Time: 11 minutes Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit newsroom that focuses on authorities integrity

Studying Time: 11 minutes

Wisconsin Watch is a nonprofit newsroom that focuses on authorities integrity and high quality of life points. Join our publication for extra tales straight to your inbox.

A two-story workplace constructing in a Milwaukee suburb homes three entities which have led a months-long marketing campaign sowing doubt about Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election.

The grey, vague constructing in Brookfield lists a few dozen occupants, together with a advertising firm on the primary flooring, and monetary companies corporations on the second.

However there are three occupants whose names are nowhere to be discovered: Particular Counsel Michael Gableman, lawyer Erick Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society.

The three, led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court docket Justice Gableman, are collaborating on the $676,000 investigation into alleged election fraud launched by Meeting Speaker Robin Vos. 

Though he lacks a contract or official position in Gableman’s taxpayer-funded investigation, Kaardal has turn into a de facto lead investigator. A Wisconsin Watch evaluation reveals roughly half of the chapters in Gableman’s 136-page interim report are based mostly on Kaardal’s work.

Since September, the Minnesota lawyer and the conservative Chicago regulation agency for which he works have subleased workplace house for about $3,000 a month immediately from an organization owned by Gableman.

This Brookfield, Wis., workplace constructing is the headquarters for former state Supreme Court docket Justice Michael Gableman’s investigation of the 2020 election. Lawyer Erick Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society are subleasing workplace house from Gableman’s firm as they help within the Meeting’s investigation. (Matt Mencarini / Wisconsin Watch)
That is the entrance foyer of the Brookfield, Wis., workplace constructing, the place former state Supreme Court docket Justice Michael Gableman is working the Meeting’s investigation of the 2020 election. Gableman, lawyer Erick Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society’s names should not listed as occupants on the listing. (Matt Mencarini / Wisconsin Watch)

Kaardal’s and Thomas Extra Society’s connections to — and potential affect on — Gableman’s investigation stretch past 2,100 sq. ft of workplace house. As a non-public lawyer, Kaardal additionally represents folks beneath guardianship orders featured in Gableman’s investigation — shoppers he costs are victims of “voter abuse.”

Rep. Mark Spreitzer, D-Beloit, a member of the Meeting Committee on Campaigns and Elections, mentioned he “completely” has considerations in regards to the relationship between Kaardal, the Thomas Extra Society and Gableman.

Spreitzer additionally criticized the standard of the knowledge Gableman has launched thus far, such because the suspiciously excessive voter turnout charges for nursing properties — claims that media organizations have debunked. 

“It’s cherry-picked (information) at finest, and easily flawed at worst,” Spreitzer mentioned. 

Gableman’s workplace didn’t return a message searching for remark, and neither did representatives for Vos, R- Rochester, or Democratic Lawyer Basic Josh Kaul, who’s suing Gableman and Vos, arguing they lack authority to drive officers to take part within the investigation.

Gableman’s authentic contract expired on the finish of final yr, however was prolonged via the top of this month. It now seems to be nearing an in depth. Gableman has mentioned just lately Vos intends to halt his investigation earlier than the top of the month. 

‘Professional-family’ group shifts to elections

For practically 25 years, the Thomas Extra Society was finest recognized for submitting pro-life and “pro-family” litigation, together with representing a California baker who refused to make a cake for a same-sex couple’s wedding ceremony.

However in recent times, Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society have turn into central figures in questioning the validity of the 2020 election — pushing theories that judges, audits and different critiques have rejected.

Erick Kaardal delivers remarks to members of the Wisconsin Meeting elections committee on the State Capitol in Madison, Wis., on March 1, 2022. Kaardal and the nonprofit regulation agency, Thomas Extra Society, are taking part in unofficial however central roles within the ongoing investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election. (Screenshot through WisEye)

The society’s funding has ballooned because it added election-related litigation to its focus areas. Its monetary assertion for the 2020 fiscal yr, the newest obtainable, confirmed $17.4 million in income, up from $9.6 million the earlier yr.

That cash has helped Thomas Extra file lawsuits in a number of states difficult how the 2020 election was administered, with a specific curiosity within the grant cash to native municipalities from the Heart for Tech and Civic Life, a Mark Zuckerberg-funded charity.

Amongst Kaardal’s different election-related lawsuits is a 2020 case towards then-Vice President Mike Pence, Congress and others searching for to cease the Electoral School depend that was so crammed with “baseless fraud allegations and tenuous authorized claims” that the decide filed an ethics referral towards him. That matter continues to be pending.

Final month, as Gableman offered the findings in his interim report back to the Meeting Committee on Campaigns and Elections, he complimented Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society, saying they’d completed “very substantial and really fantastic work on behalf of the folks of this state.”

However the tangled relationships elevate questions on who Kaardal is de facto working for: himself and his shoppers, the Thomas Extra Society or the state of Wisconsin.

‘Unseemly’ relationship?

A lot of what Gableman launched final month repackaged earlier work from Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society, together with video interviews with seven of Kaardal’s personal shoppers.

Kaardal advised Wisconsin Watch he supplied the previous justice with data that he gathered whereas making ready for lawsuits and complaints, however that Gableman didn’t move alongside something his workforce had realized.

Attorneys for the Thomas Extra Society, Peter Breen, vice chairman and senior counsel, and Thomas Brejcha, president and chief counsel, pose of their Chicago workplaces on July 10, 2013. The Thomas Extra Society is taking part in a central however unofficial position within the investigation into Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election. (Nancy Stone / Chicago Tribune)

Tom Brejcha, Thomas Extra Society’s president, mentioned in an interview that he noticed no conflicts of curiosity with the connections and communications between himself, his regulation agency and Gableman. And he grew to become offended when pressed to make clear these relationships.

“We labored with him on the investigation,” Brejcha mentioned of the reference to Gableman, later including that “we needed to know the character of the investigation and the way we might assist.”

Gableman had shared data with them, he mentioned, however nothing that was confidential. 

“I’m certain we’ve exchanged details about issues of public concern,” Brejcha mentioned, including that he’s talked with Gableman “a handful of occasions” however declined to say how typically or once they final spoke.

At one level, Brejcha accused Wisconsin Watch of launching an “assault” on Gableman. “I don’t care to proceed this anymore,” he mentioned, and finally hung up.

Jeff Mandell, a Madison lawyer who focuses on election regulation, mentioned it’s an “unseemly” relationship between entities with completely different targets.

“There’s actually a blurring of strains,” he mentioned, “between what’s imagined to be an impartial authorities investigation and personal, partisan actors.”

‘Shield the folks from the federal government’

Kaardal has been a lawyer for the reason that early Nineties and, in his personal phrases, has made a profession of suing the federal government.

“My viewpoint is that a very powerful factor for courts to do is defend the folks from the federal government,” he mentioned.

He’s filed dozens of lawsuits in state and federal courts — lots of them over election administration. 

In 2012, Kaardal unsuccessfully challenged Minnesota’s same-day voter registration process, which Wisconsin additionally has. That lawsuit additionally alleged that Minnesota residents who had been beneath guardianship orders and ineligible to vote had been in a position to register and forged ballots, a declare he’s made in Wisconsin in current months in complaints he filed with the Wisconsin Elections Fee. The argument additionally failed in Minnesota, however Gableman included the allegations in his report and presentation in March.

In 2019, Kaardal represented a bunch of landlords in Minneapolis and St. Paul in a federal lawsuit that argued ordinances that required them to offer voter registration data to new tenants violated their First Modification proper to not communicate. 

Kaardal and the landlords received.

‘Christian heritage’ advocacy, ethics criticism

Because the 2020 election neared, Kaardal filed a flurry of lawsuits in a number of states. 

He sued over masks mandated for in-person voting in Minnesota, which he misplaced. He represented Kanye West in his makes an attempt to get on the presidential poll in Wisconsin, and misplaced.

In his 2013 e-book, Erick Kaardal, an lawyer for the Thomas Extra Society, argues for a nationwide immigration coverage to restrict non-Christians and non-Jews to lower than 10% of the U.S. inhabitants. Kaardal is taking part in a central however unofficial position within the election investigation led by former Wisconsin Supreme Court docket Justice Michael Gableman. (Screenshot from

And in December 2020, he filed a lawsuit on behalf of plaintiffs together with the Wisconsin Voters Alliance — a part of a multi-state “election integrity watchdog” group — to stop Pence and Congress from counting the electoral votes on Jan. 6, arguing that solely state legislatures had the authority to certify the election. 

The day after the election was licensed, Kaardal voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit in federal court docket in Washington, D.C. However that didn’t cease a federal decide from referring him to the Committee on Grievances for potential self-discipline. The decide known as Kaardal’s authorized principle “someplace between a willful misreading of the Structure and fantasy.” Kaardal is preventing the referral. He declined to touch upon it.

Kaardal additionally co-authored a number of books, together with a 2013 tome that advocated for preserving “the Christian cultural heritage” of the USA via immigration insurance policies that may restrict the variety of people who find themselves not Jewish or Christian to not more than 10% of the inhabitants.

In an e mail, Kaardal defended his writing, saying, “The books, if one reads them, stand on their very own as an try to contribute to present political philosophy.” 

Thomas Extra turns to elections

For the reason that early Nineties, the Thomas Extra Society — which operates as a tax exempt 501(c)(3), the identical nonprofit designation as Wisconsin Watch — has spent a lot of its time and sources on anti-abortion and self-described household values lawsuits. It’s named after St. Thomas Extra, the patron saint of legal professionals amongst Catholics.

The regulation agency efficiently defended a maternity shelter in Missouri that fought a state mandate to offer insurance coverage protection for contraception. And throughout the pandemic, it represented church buildings that refused to abide by government-issued COVID-19 restrictions, getting victories for a few of their shoppers.

In January, the agency received a $75,000 settlement for a Louisville, Kentucky police officer who was investigated for marching in uniform with protesters exterior of an abortion clinic.

A yr earlier than the 2020 election, the general public curiosity regulation agency added “voter integrity” and “voter participation” to its mission assertion for the primary time. Kaardal advised Wisconsin Watch that the group had seen election administration points had “ripened” through the years and turn into “politicized.”

Mandell, the election regulation lawyer, mentioned regardless of the society being new to election litigation, “They’ve actually include a vengeance for it in Wisconsin.”

Election grants at coronary heart of probe 

In his March presentation to the committee, Gableman adopted the society’s oft-repeated declare that officers in 5 Democratic-leaning cities — Inexperienced Bay, Kenosha, Milwaukee, Madison and Racine — dedicated “election bribery” by accepting $8.8 million in grants. 

Gableman’s cost is that officers in these “Zuckerberg 5” cities used unlawful grant cash from the Heart for Tech and Civic Life — which went to greater than 200 Wisconsin municipalities — to facilitate voting. The cash went towards coaching extra election staff, including safe poll drop containers, conducting voter training campaigns and different duties.

Michael Gableman delivers remarks to members of the Wisconsin Meeting elections committee on the State Capitol in Madison, Wis., on March 1, 2022. Roughly half of Gableman’s report on his election investigation delivered that day was based mostly on work by lawyer Erick Kaardal and the nonprofit Thomas Extra Society regulation agency, who don’t have any official position within the taxpayer-funded probe. (John Hart / Wisconsin State Journal)

The state election bribery regulation bans anybody from giving cash, employment or the rest of worth to entice somebody to vote or not vote, or to vote a specific approach. Gableman devotes practically half of his 136-page interim report to those grants.

Previous to the election, Kaardal filed a federal lawsuit in Wisconsin over the CTCL cash, which a decide dismissed. After the election, he filed complaints with the Wisconsin Elections Fee, which had been additionally thrown out.

“We will’t have third events utilizing non-public cash to affect cities to do an unlawful … election administration,” Kaardal mentioned. “And in order that’s why we’re gonna win.”

However thus far, that hasn’t occurred.

He’s filed state and federal lawsuits over the CTCL grant cash in a minimum of 5 states: Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Iowa and Georgia. Kaardal misplaced all of the lawsuits filed earlier than the election. Some fits Kaardal filed after the election stay pending. 

Atiba Ellis, a Marquette College regulation college professor who focuses on election regulation, mentioned grants to assist municipalities run elections are accepted observe throughout the nation. 

“Wanting voters getting paid immediately out of those grants, it appears tough for me to make a connection between what the parents who’re getting these grants are doing and credible claims or bribery,” Ellis mentioned.

He mentioned labeling the grants as election bribery is “a harmful highway to go down” as a result of native governments depend on grant cash to hold out all types of fundamental capabilities. 

It’s a “disservice to the regulation,” Ellis mentioned, “to recommend fraudulent conduct on probably the most tenuous proof.”

Spreitzer, the Democratic Meeting member, mentioned he requested the Legislative Council for any case regulation supporting Gableman’s bribery declare. He mentioned there was none.

Kaardal’s self-styled competency checks

A second main Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society declare that landed in Gableman’s report: that nursing residence residents who lacked psychological capability to vote had forged absentee votes — a observe they name “voter abuse.” 

In 4 instances, Gableman alleged that residents who had been discovered legally incompetent to vote had forged ballots, which raises questions in regards to the validity of these votes.  

However in different instances, Gableman relied on Kaardal’s private evaluation to query a voter’s competence.

Erick Kaardal interviews nursing residence resident Sandra Klitzke on this WisEye video performed at a March 1, 2022 Wisconsin Meeting elections committee listening to. Klitzke’s final identify is misspelled on the video. (Screenshot from WisEye)

That’s not how Wisconsin regulation works, nevertheless. Solely a decide within the context of a guardianship continuing can decide whether or not an individual has the psychological capability to forged a poll, in accordance with the Wisconsin Elections Fee. Being positioned beneath guardianship by itself doesn’t take away an individual’s proper to vote. And, “state regulation doesn’t enable for the proper to vote to be taken away, even by relations, with out such an adjudication,” the elections company mentioned.

Gableman included movies of Kaardal interviewing nursing residence residents together with their guardians — who’re additionally Kaardal’s shoppers — in his presentation to the Meeting elections committee final month. He mentioned he obtained his shoppers’ approval earlier than sharing them.

Kaardal requested a few most popular selection between hypothetical candidates — one who needed to lift taxes and one other who didn’t — in addition to questions on what occurs on Election Day and the way a winner is picked. The befuddled residents typically stumbled over their solutions to Kaardal’s generally long-winded questions. 

Gableman described Kaardal’s check as “questions which might be put out by the elections boards to assist decide whether or not somebody has the acuity to have the ability to make a understanding selection for voting. He’s not making these questions up. They’re standardized questions to find out if a possible voter has the psychological capability to vote.”

However Kaardal described them a lot in a different way. He advised Wisconsin Watch he discovered the questions on-line in a regulation evaluate or medical journal article. Whereas on the cellphone with a reporter, Kaardal looked for the article and its questions on-line, however couldn’t discover them. 

“I don’t even know if I spent the time saving it, however I ought to have,” he mentioned. “… I discovered it on-line. If I searched somewhat bit extra I might discover it. However in case you simply put in ‘competency evaluation check for voting,’ I feel you’ll find yourself discovering the place I discovered it.”

The highest Google search outcomes for “competency evaluation check for voting” embody a Wikipedia article describing literacy checks that some jurisdictions used to disenfranchise Black voters for a protracted stretch of American historical past. Such checks have been banned for greater than 50 years, for the reason that passage of the Voting Rights Act. 

‘Their voting rights should be upheld’

Barbara Beckert, of the advocacy group Incapacity Rights Wisconsin, picked aside Kaardal’s self-styled competency examination throughout the Wisconsin Elections Fee assembly in March. 

“Wisconsin doesn’t require or enable voting checks that individuals should move in an effort to vote — nor ought to they,” Beckert mentioned. “No voter in Wisconsin has ever (been) requested the sort of query, and voters are by no means requested to clarify why they vote for a specific candidate.” 

Meeting elections committee member Rep. Mark Spreitzer, D-Beloit, says he’s involved in regards to the position of Erick Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society within the taxpayer-funded probe into Wisconsin’s 2020 presidential election. He’s seen at Gov. Tony Evers’ second State of the State handle on the State Capitol on Jan. 22, 2020 in Madison, Wis. (Coburn Dukehart / Wisconsin Watch)

Federal regulation requires Medicaid-certified long run care amenities to help residents who wish to vote, she mentioned, “And we’re involved that on account of these investigations, care facility workers at the moment are afraid to help residents with voting.” 

Beckert added that “It’s discriminatory and unconscionable to disenfranchise Wisconsin residents just because they dwell in a care facility. Their voting rights should be upheld.”

After Gableman confirmed the movies throughout the March 1 listening to, Spreitzer mentioned he submitted an open information request for the complete, unedited model of the interviews. He was advised Gableman didn’t have them — elevating but extra questions, Spreitzer mentioned, in regards to the position of Kaardal and the Thomas Extra Society within the investigation.

The nonprofit Wisconsin Watch ( collaborates with WPR, PBS Wisconsin, different information media and the College of Wisconsin-Madison College of Journalism and Mass Communication. All works created, revealed, posted or disseminated by Wisconsin Watch don’t essentially mirror the views or opinions of UW-Madison or any of its associates.

Republish our articles totally free, on-line or in print, beneath a Artistic Commons license.


Republish this text

Scroll down to repeat and paste the code of our article into your CMS. The codes for photos, graphics and different embeddable parts might not switch precisely as they seem on our website.

You might be welcome to republish our articles for free utilizing the next floor guidelines.

  • Credit score must be given, on this format: “By Dee J. Corridor, Wisconsin Watch”
  • If revealed on-line, it’s essential to embody the hyperlinks and hyperlink to
  • Should you share the story on social media, please point out @wisconsinwatch (TwitterFb and Instagram)
  • Don’t promote the story — it will not be marketed as a person product.
  • Don’t promote adverts towards the story. However you’ll be able to publish it with pre-sold adverts.
  • Your web site should embody a distinguished strategy to contact you.
  • Extra parts which might be packaged with our story should be labeled.
  • Customers can republish our pictures, illustrations, graphics and multimedia parts ONLY with tales with which they initially appeared. It’s possible you’ll not separate multimedia parts for standalone use. 
  • If we ship you a request to alter or take away Wisconsin Watch content material out of your website, it’s essential to agree to take action instantly.

For questions concerning republishing guidelines please contact Andy Corridor, government director, at [email protected]